Re: RAQMON PDU Notification Objects - Table or Scalar?

Hi -

> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
> To: "Mark Ellison" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:25 AM
> Subject: RE: [RMONMIB] RAQMON PDU Notification Objects - Table or Scalar?
...
> What I got until now:
>
> - SNMP is optional and not recommended.

I had understood it to be "SNMP is optional" and "use of traps is NOT RECOMMENDED"

> - if SNMP is supported, recommend doing INFORMs

> RDS-MIB structure. three options:
>
> - keep the table as is, define initital and continuous reporting notifications
> - keep table but change indexing as suggested by Mark, initial notification points
>   to subsession identifiers, then continuous notifications use this
> - change to scalar
...

Can you confirm or deny whether it was a goal to, as Mark put it,
"commingle statistics from different (sub)sessions in a single report "?
This, and effectively dropping TRAPs as way of carrying this stuff,
will affect which of the alternatives would make more sense.

Randy