Re: 3rd try: TimeFilter text with corrections

Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:56:55 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Bert and Dave (mostly),

Do the updates look okay?
After Juergen and Dave spent so much time on this,
I decided to put a day in as well.   I think the new text
is more informative, describes more corner cases, and
will help new implementations of TimeFilter. 


2 more edits:

-----------------------------------------------------------
(bullet list at start of example)
OLD:

      - fooEntry.N.3 is created at time '3', and most recently
           updated at time '5' to the value '17'.

NEW:

      - fooEntry.N.3 is created at time '3', updated at time '5'
           to the value '17', and deleted at time '7'.

------------------------------------------------

(2nd to last paragraph)

OLD:

 Note that no instances for entry 'fooCounts.N.3' are returned since
        it has not changed since time '6'.

NEW:

 Note that no instances for entry 'fooCounts.N.3' are returned since
        it was deleted at time '7'.

---------------------------------------------------


>On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:46:31PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Trying Notepad instead of Thunderbird editor.  Also fixed some bugs.
>>I hope we can finally settle the TimeFilter issues and get on with
>>the RFC 2021 update. 
>>    
>>
>
>Looks good to me. I think this is much clearer. Two small nits:
>
>OLD
>      for an agent to implement a time-filtered table the traditional
>
>NEW
>      for an agent to implement a time-filtered table in the traditional
>
>OLD
>      actually be defined.
>
>NEW
>      actually be defined.)
>
>/js
>
>  
>