Re: 3rd try: TimeFilter text with corrections
Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:56:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
Bert and Dave (mostly),
Do the updates look okay?
After Juergen and Dave spent so much time on this,
I decided to put a day in as well. I think the new text
is more informative, describes more corner cases, and
will help new implementations of TimeFilter.
2 more edits:
-----------------------------------------------------------
(bullet list at start of example)
OLD:
- fooEntry.N.3 is created at time '3', and most recently
updated at time '5' to the value '17'.
NEW:
- fooEntry.N.3 is created at time '3', updated at time '5'
to the value '17', and deleted at time '7'.
------------------------------------------------
(2nd to last paragraph)
OLD:
Note that no instances for entry 'fooCounts.N.3' are returned since
it has not changed since time '6'.
NEW:
Note that no instances for entry 'fooCounts.N.3' are returned since
it was deleted at time '7'.
---------------------------------------------------
>On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:46:31PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Trying Notepad instead of Thunderbird editor. Also fixed some bugs.
>>I hope we can finally settle the TimeFilter issues and get on with
>>the RFC 2021 update.
>>
>>
>
>Looks good to me. I think this is much clearer. Two small nits:
>
>OLD
> for an agent to implement a time-filtered table the traditional
>
>NEW
> for an agent to implement a time-filtered table in the traditional
>
>OLD
> actually be defined.
>
>NEW
> actually be defined.)
>
>/js
>
>
>