RE: RAQMON I-Ds Status

On my plane-ride from NL to Vancouver I did review all 3
RAQMON documents. I have hoped that I would have just
minor comments and that I could request IETF Last Call.

However, I have found a lot of things that I want clarified
- inconsistencies between the 3 documents
- questions about "how one can implement from the specs and
  assume to be interoperable"

So I wonder... who in the rmonmib WG has actually seriously 
reviewed those documents? I must admit that I did not read
the I-Ds in detail for a long time. But fro my AD-review I 
did, and I now really wonder. I'll try to speak with the
authors during this IETF week, and then I hope to find
time to type-up my comments/concerns at the end of IETF64.

Futher I have lots of nitpicking that could be fixed.
Since I suspect that we may need new revisions because of the
above 2 major points, the nist may get fixed as well.

Bert