Re: RAQMON Last Call

Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:13:23 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fardid, Reza wrote:
>
>  
>
> From a Service Provider point of view, it is important to a) measure 
> and differentiate signaling and media QoS metrics of delay and packet 
> loss, and b) report their measurements separately.  This 
> differentiation may gain more significance, when one SP does not have 
> administrative and measurement control over the end-to-end path(s) 
> traversed by signaling and media packets, prompting the IPPM WG to 
> undertake work to define Spatial Composition of Metrics. Even though 
> the RAQMON MIB differentiates between signaling and application delay, 
> it does not clearly do so for packet loss.
>

What is the percentage of signaling to data packets we are talking about 
here?
Please try to quantify the error that counting packet loss in this manner
will introduce.

I do not believe there is WG consensus to change the RAQMON Basic Report
contents at this time.  There is a mechanism within RAQMON for defining
additional reports and additional report elements.  IMO, we should gain
implementation experience with the Basic Report we have now, and refine
it over time, based on deployment experience and feedback.

>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Reza Fardid
>
> Covad Communications
>
>  
>

Andy