Re: Updated version of FLUTE-revised

Hello,

Good points. ESP/WEBRC references are now normative and I also
corrected "...that any out-of-band transmission ..." as Rod suggested.

Cheers,

    Vincent

On 01/21/2010 03:32 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> [email protected] skrev 2010-01-21 15:16:
>    
>> Magnus is spot on.
>>
>> ESP. Section 7.5 makes this clear so [30] does indeed need to be normative
>>
>> WEBRC. Section 1.1.4 states "implementations of ALC MUST support the
>> WEBRC [27]  multiple rate congestion control scheme [2]." and thus
>> implicitly indicate that ""implementations of FLUTE MUST support the
>> WEBRC" since "All of the environmental requirements and considerations
>> that apply to the ALC building block [2] and to any additional building
>> blocks that FLUTE uses also apply to FLUTE." And so, [27] should also be
>> normative. (Note, this does not make implementation of WEBRC manditory,
>> but it makes the ability to support an implementation of WEBRC manditory
>> - which seems perfect as that ensures the public Internet transport
>> layer congestion defence is supported without overloading the various
>> wireless broadcast systems that deal with congestion/prioritisation in
>> other ways).
>>
>> (I assume WEBRC is normative in ALC!)
>>
>>      
> Yes, and there where no issues with the downref at that time. So flute
> shouldn't either have any.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>