Re: FLUTE revision

Jani Peltotalo <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:51:07 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear RMTers,

One side effect of the version number change is problem with ALC and LCT
versions. Version number is signalled in the LCT header field and in
RFCs 5775 and 5651 (FLUTE revised will be working on top of these RFCs)
version number is specified to be 1.

So it is not possible to signal FLUTE version 2 and ALC/LCT version 1 in
the same header field.

BR,
Jani

> Dear RMTers, We are in the process of revising FLUTE –11, to produce
> FLUTE –12, and it is clear at this point that the FLUTE version number
> will transition from 1 to 2.  One question that has arisen: Can an FDT
> instance have a TOI > 0 with an EXT_FDT LCT extension header containing
> the FDT Instance ID?  I think it is and should be restricted to TOI = 0
> for carrying FDT instances, but there is some ambiguities in the text
> here and there that might be construed to suggest otherwise.
> Mike  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rmt mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt