FLUTE v2

<[email protected]> Mon, 9 May 2011 13:39:44 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all

It's pretty clear that as a group and individuals we are short of the energy and determination to tie-up every loose thread of the RMT adventure. For me, the one and only issue preventing FLUTE staying at the sensible and consistent v1 status was highlight by Mike...

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt/current/msg01513.html

...running through all the specs and the multitude of related SDO adoptions takes a lot of footwork and singular dedication. I'm am not in such a position to do that nowadays. Even running through the maze of security IDs and RFCs to get FLUTE-SDP finished has taken months to get done on-the-side.

So unless we have an energetic and enthusiastic spec miner who is willing to take on the task Mike pointed out, then I propose we push forward to a v1.1.

(just kidding, we should all the way to 1.9 :)

And thus, with Jani's energy and hard work, I can focus on the finished flute-SDP (coming any day now).

Cheers, Rod.