[EXP2STD] IANA Registries for LCT Header Extentions ?

"Mark Watson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
All,

 

In updating the LCT and ALC documents for Standards Track, I have come
again across the fact that there is no process defined for specifying
new LCT Header Extensions.

 

LCT divides the LCT Header Extension Type range into two parts, a
general part and a PI-specific part. LCT then defines two general LCT
Header Extensions (EXT_NOP and EXT_AUTH).

 

ALC goes on to define an ALC-specific LCT Header Extension EXT_FTI.
FLUTE defines two further ALC-specific extensions EXT_FDT and EXT_CENC.

 

I think we should have IANA registries for these: a registry for the
general LCT header extensions (which would be established in the 'IANA
Considerations' of LCT) and registries for the PI-specific header
extensions (one for each PI, established by the 'IANA Considerations' of
each PI specification).

 

Comments ? What should the allocation rules be ? "IETF Consensus",
"Specification Required" ?

 

Regards,

 

Mark

_______________________________________________
Rmt mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.