[EXP2STD] IANA Registries for LCT Header Extentions ?
"Mark Watson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All, In updating the LCT and ALC documents for Standards Track, I have come again across the fact that there is no process defined for specifying new LCT Header Extensions. LCT divides the LCT Header Extension Type range into two parts, a general part and a PI-specific part. LCT then defines two general LCT Header Extensions (EXT_NOP and EXT_AUTH). ALC goes on to define an ALC-specific LCT Header Extension EXT_FTI. FLUTE defines two further ALC-specific extensions EXT_FDT and EXT_CENC. I think we should have IANA registries for these: a registry for the general LCT header extensions (which would be established in the 'IANA Considerations' of LCT) and registries for the PI-specific header extensions (one for each PI, established by the 'IANA Considerations' of each PI specification). Comments ? What should the allocation rules be ? "IETF Consensus", "Specification Required" ? Regards, Mark _______________________________________________ Rmt mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt