Re: Fecframe BOF next week
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tsvwg,gmane.ietf.mmusic,gmane.ietf.avt,gmane.ietf.rmt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Watson wrote: > All, > > There will be a BOF session on Wednesday afternoon next week on the > topic of FEC over transport protocols. The objective is to consider > starting work on a framework for generalized FEC protection of IP flows > over unreliable transport (possibly based on the framework presented in > draft-watson-tsgwg-fec-sf-00 which I presented at TSVWG and AVT at IETF63.) This is a little confusing; in the IETF, transport happens over IP, not the other way around. And the term flows applies to IPv6, but not as well to IPv4. Do you mean FEC of unreliable transport flows over IP? (that seems what the BOF is talking about)? > The BOF description and agenda are available at: > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/agenda/fecframe.txt > > > > As many of you will be aware, there is increasing interest in applying > FEC to media streams in a variety of environments, but a notable lack of > IETF protocols to support that in a way which is independent of the > actual FEC code used. This would would aim to address that in a way > which is as far of possible generic with respect to transport and > application protocols as well. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mark Watson > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > tsvwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDak9vE5f5cImnZrsRAhOLAJ9SOr2+z8EJdUGRa6O3tFpiUOhdegCg/qfz LoVKyPZvX2g+VKIfHWJW52Q= =YFfm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----