any outstanding issue with draft-ietf-rmt-fec-bb-revised-03 ?
Lorenzo Vicisano <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
the previus version of this went through WG last-call, then the
following happened:
- discussion on the requirements to instantiate new FEC IDs -> due
to lack of consensus I proposed to maintain the current
requirement (IETF Consensus)
- Minor updates where needed following the Vancouver IETF meeting
(these are included in -03, I believe).
does anybody see any reason to hold this back ?
If I don't hear anything by 2/27 I'll ask Allison to submit this to the
IESG.
thanks,
Lorenzo