any outstanding issue with draft-ietf-rmt-fec-bb-revised-03 ?

Lorenzo Vicisano <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
the previus version of this went through WG last-call, then the
following happened:

  - discussion on the requirements to instantiate new FEC IDs -> due
    to lack of consensus I proposed to maintain the current
    requirement (IETF Consensus)

  - Minor updates where needed following the Vancouver IETF meeting
    (these are included in -03, I believe).

does anybody see any reason to hold this back ?

If I don't hear anything by 2/27 I'll ask Allison to submit this to the
IESG.

	thanks,
	Lorenzo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.