Here's a NACK to avoid any confusion.
We don't see any need to present either of these two:
1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mehta-rmt-flute-sdp-05.txt
(also
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=
12084&rfc_flag=0)
2.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised-01.txt
There may be a flute-revised-02 if there are minor typos, but at time of
writing I think that 01 is technically in order and appropriate for RMT
review. (Noting that 2 parts of FLUTE have been moved to others in the
RMT family: the blocking algorithm appears in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-fec-bb-revised-03.txt
and EXT_FTI instances will appear in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-
revised-02.txt when submitted).
I'm not in Dallas, but if attention is turned to the question of SDP for
underspecified LCT and ALC session descriptions I'll try to
telepathically transmit my thoughts :)
Cheers, Rod.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Lorenzo Vicisano [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: 01 March, 2006 18:45
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Rmt] call for agenda items, IETF 65th , Dallas
>
>If you have items to include in the RMT meeting agenda, please
>let me know by replying to this email.
>
>I'm planning to publish a draft agenda by/during the coming weekend.
>
>FYI: the meeting is *tentatively* scheduled for Monday, March
>20 at 15:20 (http://www.ietf.org/meetings/agenda_65.txt).
>
> thank you,
> Lorenzo
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rmt mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.