Re: last call on Raptor publication
Marshall Eubanks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just because I think the options should go with the email thread,
here they are again :
"We have the options of:
a) asking the IESG to publish raptor as a Standard-Track document
(as originally planned).
b) abandoning raptor as a WG standard
c) asking the IESG to publish raptor as experimental or
informational. Note that this might create problems with the
IANA allocation of FEC IDs etc."
And I support option a.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think people know my personal opinion on this, which is (A).
> However it is the WG's decision on what you want to do with the
> document. So don't count me for more than a participant in this case.
>
> If we go with A. I (as an AD) will ensure that the writeup includes
> the WG's position and the fact that there is known IPR.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287
> Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rmt mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt