RE: congestion control in FLUTE

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
FLUTE's approach is inherited from ALC - i.e. this needs doing for ALC
and then FLUTE inherits the solution. I would have thought it absolutely
should not be further described in FLUTE (possibly not in ALC either)
according to the RMT building block approach. Is that about right?

Cheers, Rod.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Magnus Westerlund [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: 01 December, 2006 15:27
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [Rmt] congestion control in FLUTE
>
>Hi,
>
>As FLUTE is an application of the RMT building blocs I think 
>it needs to specify how the hell you actually apply some 
>congestion control on the sessions. In section 4 there is 
>discussion about four scenarios of how this may be done. I 
>think it will be necessary to flesh out how one actually 
>perform A and C using the available tools. That means 
>specifying how you actually can apply WEBRC and TFMCC to flute 
>and what restrictions that do apply. It might not be necessary 
>to define both, however we do need something that works well 
>in most deployments where FLUTE is used.
>
>It would also be really good to see someone write up the glue 
>that is need to enable implementation of WEBRC. There seem to 
>be need for clarification on how to handle the WEBRC channels 
>and in addition how one signal this to the receivers using SDP.
>
>I want to get this going as I don't think we will be able to 
>proceed to standards track with flute unless we have a solid 
>congestion control story.
>
>Cheers
>
>Magnus Westerlund
>
>IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
>Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
>S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rmt mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.