Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-lct-revised-07
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Watson skrev: > On the last point, since ALC is the more 'well-known' layer, and since LCT > cannot be used 'stand-alone' would it be acceptable in the LCT draft to just > state the security issues that must be addressed by any PI based on LCT and > refer to ALC for an example ? This would avoid either duplicating the text > or confusing people by moving the existing text from ALC to LCT. I think that clear requirements is the most important. However, some informational references to existing solutions is to me highly beneficial because they explain that the requirements are not unsolvable. cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected] ----------------------------------------------------------------------