Re: IETF74 FCAST Action Item

Hi Brian,

> 1) Do you think there is merit in the FCAST specification as an RMT
> WG item (or not)?

I support it.
Supporting both ALC and NORM would be highly beneficial for various
use-cases. And no IPR issue will be good for potential developers.

> 2) Will you review the document so that we can rapidly finish it if
> it is accepted as a working group item?

Yes, I'd be happy to review the document.

Regards,
--
Hitoshi Asaeda