Re: IETF74 FCAST Action Item

Hi,

If the interest for this item is this low, I am very hesitant to approve
taking it on as WG item.

Cheers

Magnus

Brian Adamson skrev:
> Hello,
> 
> During discussions at the IETF74 RMT meeting, we concluded that we
> should poll the mailing list to determine if there is sufficient
> interest in adding the new FCAST document and pursuing it as an RMT
> working group item.  There was some interest expressed during the
> working group meeting and a number of folks raised their hands
> indicating they would review the document (i.e. we need broader
> participation than just the document authors!)
> 
> This message requests interested parties to respond on the mailing list
> to indicate their opinion on this:
> 
> 1) Do you think there is merit in the FCAST specification as an RMT WG
> item (or not)?
> 
> 2) Will you review the document so that we can rapidly finish it if it
> is accepted as a working group item?
> 
> 
> Thank you in advance for your responses to this query.
> 
> best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Brian Adamson
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rmt mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------