Re: IPR statement in RFC 3450

Magnus,

I'll let Mark clarify this further, but my understanding is that the
IPR statement
in the draft is incorrect and that the is no IPR claim on this (or RFC 3450)
that we know of.

  Lorenzo

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Magnus Westerlund
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the IESG review Cullen raised the issue about the statement in RFC 3450:
>
> 7.  Intellectual Property Issues
>
>   The IETF has been notified of intellectual property rights claimed in
>   regard to some or all of the specification contained in this
>   document.  For more information consult the online list of claimed
>   rights.
>
> This indicates that there should be an IPR disclosure regarding RFC
> 3450, and that likely also applies to draft-ietf-rmt-pi-alc-revised
> also. Can anyone in the WG please shed some light on the statement and
> if there should be a IPR disclosue also on draft-ietf-rmt-pi-alc-revised?
>
> Thanks
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Rmt mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
>