Re: Regarding De compression failure
Sarkar Biplab <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Vamsi, The ROHC protocol is aimed for robustness but not for reliability. So the reliability aspect is beyond its scope. Thanks & Regards Biplab On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 19:17 +0530, Vamsikrishna wrote: > Hi > I have a doubt during the Decompression failure scenario. > > If we use ROHC for reliable services and if the decompression is failed for > a packet, is there > any chance of retransmitting the packet by the compressor? > > Is there any built in buffering mechanism at the compressor so that it can > retransmit the packets > if it recieves an indication of decompression failure? > > If the compressor is not able to retransmit the packet is there any chance > for upper layer > retransmission procedure? > > Thanks & Regards > Vamsi > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments contained in it. > > Contact your Administrator for further information. > > _______________________________________________ > Rohc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc _______________________________________________ Rohc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIrVUl3rQBTW1UPu4RAhyoAKCI8g7w7Q1QM3tnIx3hbbk5uS7//wCgllpC xDkSs2PJIVC5hozpiANIuKM= =eyxy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----