Re: Regarding RoHC version2 Profiles

Hi,

I recommend that you actually read RFC5225. The answers to your
questions will become apparent when you do.
Your first two questions were even answered on this list as late as 
yesterday, so please read those answers as well.

/k

Rajani A wrote on :

> Hi ,
> 
>           I have some doubts regarding RoHC Version2 Profiles [RFC
> 5225]. I request you to clarify me on the below list.
> 
> 1. Compressor State Machines
> 2. RoHC Modes of Operation
> 3. Encoding Techniques. i.e., RFC 5225 says "
> inferred_ip_v4_header_checksum" as an encoding method.
>     But it is the same for RFC 3095 specified profiles, where
> it is implicitly done, not as encoding Methods.
>     This is same for UDP Length etc.
> 
> 4. Does rfc 5225 incorporates any new encoding methods
> compared to rfc 3095??? If not, what are changes in Version2 then???
> 
> 5. Can we implement version2 profiles without any dependency
> on 3095 profiles???
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rajani
> 
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive
> use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary,
> confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
> copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and
> destroy all copies of this message and any attachments
> contained in it.