Re: Comments on current RoHC over IPSec draft
"Carl Knutsson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc,gmane.ietf.ipsec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris, Emre, On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Christou, Christos [USA] <[email protected]> wrote: -----8<--------- > As you have pointed out, the overhead varies based on profiles. Although > it might not be as ideal, the overhead we would account for PMTU could > be profile dependent. In other words, there will be an entry in the SPD > for the profiles we would like to compress over particular SA's. > Therefore, depending on the profiles identified, we could account for > the maximum possible RoHC overhead in the PMTU calculation based on the > profiles listed in the SPD. > agreed > We will not include the MAX_HEADER parameter in our drafts. > agreed /Calle