Re: ROHC over Mobile IPv6
Frank Xia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bob Thank your reply! I had a glance at these documents. The problem is that MIPv6 never mandates using IPSec tunnel when forwarding data packets. That is, it is possible that there is no any IPSec SA between tunnel ends. BR Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Stangarone" <[email protected]> To: "Frank Xia" <[email protected]> Cc: "Vijay Devarapalli" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 5:12 PM Subject: Re: [rohc] ROHC over Mobile IPv6 > Frank, > > You might take a look at a the following documents that propose how to > negotiate ROHC Channel Parameters for the use ROHC within an IPsec > tunnel with IKEv2: > > Integration of Robust Header Compression (RoHC) over IPsec Security > Associations > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-09.txt > > IKEv2 Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over > IPsec(RoHCoIPsec) > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-07.txt > > IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec > (RoHCoIPsec) > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-03.txt > > Cheers, > > Bob > _______________________________________________ > Rohc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc