Re: ROHC over Mobile IPv6

Frank Xia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rohc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Bob

Thank your reply!
I had a glance at  these documents.

The problem is  that MIPv6 never mandates using
IPSec tunnel when forwarding data packets.
That is, it is possible that there is no any IPSec
SA between tunnel ends.

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Stangarone" <[email protected]>
To: "Frank Xia" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Vijay Devarapalli" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [rohc] ROHC over Mobile IPv6


> Frank,
>
> You might take a look at a the following documents that propose how to
> negotiate ROHC Channel Parameters for the use ROHC within an IPsec
> tunnel with IKEv2:
>
> Integration of Robust Header Compression (RoHC) over IPsec Security
> Associations
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-09.txt
>
> IKEv2 Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over 
> IPsec(RoHCoIPsec)
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-07.txt
>
> IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec
> (RoHCoIPsec)
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-03.txt
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> Rohc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.