Updated ROHCoIPsec I-Ds
"Ertekin, Emre [USA]" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <37BDD2FAF2AEAE459C6C70FDC2892E4E03F79404@MCLNEXVS05.resource.ds.bah.com> |
Hi All, We have revised the three ROHCoIPsec internet-drafts based on comments we received during the WGLC. The updated drafts can be found at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hco ipsec-08.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hco ipsec-04.txt ------------------------- The following summarizes major changes to each draft: (1) draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-10.txt: -- Clarified Section 5.2 to indicate that ROHCoIPsec poses challenges for devices inspecting ESP-NULL encrypted packets -- Added a paragraph to Section 6.1; the paragraph references RFC 3759 (to help describe ROHCoIPsec operation) (2) draft-ietf-rohc-ikev2-extensions-hcoipsec-08: -- Updated text throughout the draft to reflect a signaling-based approach for initialization of ROHC channel parameters -- Updated the format of the ROHC_SUPPORTED Notify message; the contents of this message are now expressed through "ROHC Attribute Types" -- Added the capability to signal an ICV length for the integrity algorithm used in conjunction with ROHC -- Included text in the IANA considerations section that requests allocations for "ROHC Attribute Types" within the IKEv2 Parameters registry (3) draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-04: -- Clarified that the ROHC Data Item exists for both inbound and outbound SAs, and the channel parameters associated with inbound/outbound SAs -- Updated the Security considerations section: deleted text which recommended that the strength of the integrity check used with ROHC should be at least the same strength as the integrity-check used with IPsec; furthermore, indicated that the use of padding to mitigate traffic flow analysis reduces the efficiency gains offered by header compression -------------------------- Thanks to Yoav and Bob who served as CDRs during the WGLC. Thanks also to the wider ROHC working group for their review of these documents. Please let me know if you have any questions. BR, Emre