[Fwd: Query regarding V2 Profile Classification (Profile 0x104)]
Robert Stangarone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pradeep, Re 1): In the case of the decompressor, the IR packet explicitly binds the Context ID to a Profile and Context, and that is how the ROHC decompressor determines which Profile the Packet stream belongs to. In the case of the compressor, I'd think that any incoming packets that matched an available Profile would be compared to the existing Context(s) to determine if the packets were related to an existing Compressed flow in order to determine what action to take, such as creating a new Context, or updating an existing one. Re 2): I'd say that you would use Profile 0x0104 as the last choice of your ROHC Profiles. This would allow you to use any other supported Profiles first, and benefit from the resulting compression. Profile 0x0104 would only be used after it was found that none of the other non-IP headers were present to be compressed. Bob -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Query regarding V2 Profile Classification (Profile 0x104) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:19 +0530 From: Chaitanya Pradeep <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] To: <[email protected]> Dear RoHC ers, I am facing ambiguity regarding (Profile 0x104) classification in RoHC V2 Profiles. 1. On what basis we will choose Profile 0x104 in Version-2 Profiles? Because, as mentioned in RFC 5225, all the Profiles present in Rohc Version-2 support arbitrary number of IP Levels. So how do we differentiate between Profile0x104 and rest of Profiles (i.e, like Profile0x101 , Profile0x102 , Profile0x103 etc) in V2 to classify which Profile the Packet stream belongs to? 2. Is the interpretation correct? a) Profile 0x104 is chosen when the Input packet contains only IP headers and not ended by any RTP/UDP/ESP/TCP headers. (or) b) Profile 0x104 is chosen only when no other V2 profile is supported by the compressor entity other than Profile 0x104. Pls share your valuble thoughts regarding the same. Thanks, Pradeep. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments contained in it. _______________________________________________ Rohc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
Attached Message Part
(text/plain, 124 B)
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf