List compression:IPX

"Abhishek Saurabh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rohc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi All,

With reference to L-E. Jonsson's draft version of modification to RFC3095
dated August 9, 2005 (attached below)
I would like to query if the changes suggested in the draft can be taken
into consideration for current implementation
of RoHC without facing interoperatibility issues.

I was implementing the List compression of all IPv6 extension header as i
came across  draft,
which says no List compression of IP extensions should not be done
[Sec2.2].Which is contrary  to RFC4815
where there is no such statement made about not compressing of IP extensions
using List compression.

Kindly clarify  the same.I would be very thankful for your prompt
clarification on the same.

Thanks & Regards
Abhishek Saurabh
Engineer-D&D,VoIP
Tata Elxsi Ltd,Bangalore

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-improvements-00.pdf (application/pdf, 18.3 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.