Re: Rohc over IP tunnel

This submission does not make much sense to me, as ROHC already provides 
mechanisms for compression of tunneling headers (outer headers). To support 
tunneling was a requirement stated already by RFC 3096, and thus addressed 
by RFC 3095. Since then, compression of IP tunneling headers has been 
provided by all ROHC profiles.

Can you explain what you mean ROHC is missing, not doing correcty or 
efficiently, or by which other means you think ROHC is not sufficient in 
terms of IP tunnel compression?

BR
/L-E


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:25 AM
Subject: [rohc] Rohc over IP tunnel


> Hello All
>
> We have submitted a new draft to IETF. This document proposes a method  to 
> use ROHC over IP tunnel.
>
> The draft is available at
> http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-rawat-hc-tunneling-00
>
> Since we would like to continue this work further, it will be  interesting 
> for us to receive feedback on the draft and initiate  discussion at IETF.
>
> Please let us know your opinion.
>
> Regards
> Priyanka Rawat
>
> IT/TELECOM Bretagne
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rohc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc