Re: 答复: Re: Feedback formats

Cai,
 > non mode transitions: should we send feedback with mode parameter?
No, I don't think so. Why?
If there is no mode transition in progress, there is no need to
send a mode parameter.  But if there is a need to send a feedback
option (clock resolution, for example) you  must use feedback-2
and then the mode parameter must set correct.

 > if YES, which case we could use feedback-1 in profile RTP?
Where do you see a problem to use feedback-1 together with the
RTP profile?
If the decompressor ACKs an context update, a feedback-1 packet
is ok.  This could be done with a feedback-2 packet too, but why
sending larger packets than needed?  The only exception I know is
using RTP profile in optimistic mode with sparse ACK (5.7.6.) and
sending no ACK.  If you sending no ACK, no feedback-1 is
needed, because NACK is always a feedback-2 packet. But for
reliable mode you need feedback-1.

br
Klaus Warnke

[email protected] wrote:
>
> Klaus, Calle,
>
> Thank you for the detailed interpretation and sorry for joining the 
> discussion so late.
>
> I think there is no doubt that when mode transitions, any feedback 
> should be sent with mode transition parameter;
>
> i.e., use feedback-2
>
> the question is that the feedback logic of non mode transitions: 
> should we send feedback with mode parameter?
>
> if YES, which case we could use feedback-1 in profile RTP?
>
> Thanks
> 	
> *caiwei 167981*
> LTE Development Department | LTE开发部
> 	*Product Marketing System *
> *产品市场体系*
> D3-06, ZTE Corp., No.10 South Tangyan Rd.,
> Hi-tech Industrial Development Zone, Xi'an,
> P.R.China, 710065
> Tel:+86-29-88724112, 15801916689
> Email:[email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Klaus Warnke <[email protected]>*
>
> 2009-07-16 22:15
>
> 	
> 收件人
> 	Carl Knutsson <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> 抄送
> 	[email protected]
> 主题
> 	Re: [rohc] Feedback formats
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Calle, Cai,
>
> yes, I'm wrong.
> "short cut" means, there is no handshake procedure needed, but using
> feedback-1 was too short.
>
> br
> Klaus
>
> Carl Knutsson wrote:
> > Klaus, Cai,
> >
> > Using the "short cut" as Klaus describes below is not really allowed in
> > RFC3095. Section 5.6.1 is quite clear that all feedback during a mode
> > transition must carry a CRC option. The mode parameter must also be set
> > to O to transfer from U-mode to O-mode. FEEDBACK-1 doesn't have a mode
> > field and cannot carry feedback options.
> >
> > Klaus, I guess you refer to the last paragraph of section 5.6.2. It
> > should not be interpreted by its own. I agree that the wording is a bit
> > unfortunate, but I can still not see how it can be interpret it this
> > way. FEEDBACK-1 cannot be used for mode transfer between U-mode and
> > O-mode. The compressor simply don't have the information to which mode
> > to transfer to.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > /Calle
> >
> >
> > Klaus Warnke wrote:
> >  
> >> Hello cai,
> >>
> >> I'm not completely sure what your mean.
> >>
> >> First, there is a "short cut" to switch from U to O
> >> mode (5.6.2.). In this case, a feedback-1 is sufficient, because
> >> the receiving of any feedback shows to compressor that a feedback
> >> channel is available and this is the precondition for bidirectional
> >> optimistic mode.
> >>
> >> Ideally the mode transition should be profile independent. But for the
> >> IR/IR-DYN packet it isn't due to a design flaw. Only the dynamic chain
> >> of the RTP Header contains the 'M' (5.7.7.6.) flag to transmit a
> >> compression mode. For the other profiles you must use a extension-3.
> >>
> >> Hope that helps.
> >>
> >> If not, could you please explain the problem more detailed?
> >>
> >> br
> >> Klaus Warnke
> >>
> >>
> >> [email protected] wrote:
> >>    
> >>> RFC 3095 describes that when mode transitions, any feedback should be
> >>> sent with mode transition parameter;
> >>>
> >>> at the same time, the feedback logic of decompressor in U/O/R mode
> >>> also send feedback with mode parameter.
> >>>
> >>> there is a doubt that which case we could use feedback-1 in 
> profile RTP?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>                  
> >>> *caiwei 167981*
> >>> LTE Development Department | LTE¿ª·¢²¿
> >>>                  *Product Marketing System *
> >>> *²úÆ·Êг¡Ìåϵ*
> >>> D3-06, ZTE Corp., No.10 South Tangyan Rd.,
> >>> Hi-tech Industrial Development Zone, Xi'an,
> >>> P.R.China, 710065
> >>> Tel:+86-29-88724112, 15801916689
> >>> Email:[email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this 
> mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail 
> communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to 
> maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of 
> this communication to others.
> >>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
> the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are 
> those of the individual sender.
> >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE 
> Anti-Spam system.
> >>>  
> >>> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Rohc mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
> >>>  
> >>>      
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rohc mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
> >>    
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
>   


-- 
Klaus Warnke                [email protected]
http://www.acticom.de
Tel +49-30-4303.2510        Fax +49-30-4303.2519
* --------------------------------------------------------- *
acticom GmbH
Am Borsigturm 42, 13507 Berlin, Germany
Managing Directors:  Olaf Kehrer, Gerrit Schulte
Commercial Register: Berlin-Charlottenburg HRB 73245
VAT-ID DE205131766
* --------------------------------------------------------- *
This email and the information it contains may be
privileged and/or confidential. It is for the intended
addressee(s) only. The unauthorised use, disclosure or
copying of this email, or any information contained,
is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this email.

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc