Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)

On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:57, Kristofer Sandlund wrote:

> I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission
> to edit that one.

Indeed.  To corroborate (grepping for rtp_version):

rfc5225.txt:3570:    rtp_version =3D:=3D uncompressed_value(2, 0) [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:4354:    rtp_version =3D:=3D uncompressed_value(2, 2)          =
 [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:4391:    rtp_version    =3D:=3D uncompressed_value(2, 2)       =
 [   2 ];
rfc5225.txt:5137:    rtp_version    =3D:=3D uncompressed_value(2, 2)       =
 [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:5173:    rtp_version =3D:=3D uncompressed_value(2, 2)          =
 [   2 ];

Very clearly, line 3570 is the odd one out here and needs to be fixed, as R=
TP Version 0 is neither defined nor in use.

rohc_team: =

Thanks for finding this!
(If I still were rohc WG chair, I would ask you for your common name at thi=
s point, as it is customary to use wallet names on IETF lists.)

Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten