Hi Aron,
You have the XML source, so feel free to do so.
thanks,
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Silverton Aron-C1710C [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 21 August, 2003 19:51
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: Stillman Maureen (NVO-NIC/Ithaca)
> Subject: RE: [Rserpool] Comments on the comparison document
>
>
> Hi Maureen,
>
> I think that we should also add a subsection to the DNS section on the
> differences between the DNS and RSERPOOL security models.
> I'll volunteer to
> do this. Other comments related to the sections I wrote are
> below. I do,
> however, agree with the rest of your nits and non-nits.
>
> John, if you'd like me to make the edits to the draft, let me know. I
> should have the cycles to do so.
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> > I have mostly nits which are optional. Non-nits are first.
> >
> > Non-nits:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > 3.2.2 Technical Issues
> >
> > Most of the extended features of ASAP [6] and ENRP [7] are
> not met by
> > a device employing L4 switching techniques.
> >
> > The use of the word "extended" has potential for confusion. They
> > might think that ASAP and ENRP have a set of extensions that L4
> > switches don't support. In fact, ASAP and ENRP don't have any
> > extensions defined right now. I have two suggestions: 1) delete the
> > word extended and 2) add to the end of the sentence (see comparison
> > table in section 5) OR you could list some of the requirements that
> > L4 switches don't meet.
> >
>
> I think that deleting the word and referncing the table is
> the way to go. I
> was trying to say that only a subset of the ASAP and ENRP
> features could be
> met by L4 switching. Your wording is better.
>
> >
> > 3.1 Introduction
> >
> > Since these technologies
> > are highly proprietary, it is difficult to detail these
> techniques
> > in a thorough manner.
> >
> > change to (* to help you find the word(s) to change):
> >
> > Since these technologies
> > are highly proprietary, it is difficult to *discuss* these
> > techniques in a thorough manner.
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> Agreed.
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > I think this is it. Thanks.
> >
> > -- maureen
> >
>
> Aron
>
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.