Re: Inconsistent variable and threshold naming

Thomas,

Thanks for the comments. I will fix those inconsistencies in next
revision.

regards,
-Qiaobing

Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> the variable and threshold naming in the ASAP draft, section 5.2 and ENRP
> draft, section 5.2 are inconsistent. While the ASAP draft uses all lowercase
> characters, the characters in the ENRP draft are all uppercase. Furthermore,
> the ASAP draft uses a "." for "state.cache.value" but otherwise "-" (e.g.
> "max-request-retransmit"). Why not naming everything consistently, e.g. all
> lowercase with "."?
> 
> The ENRP draft defines MAX-TIME-SERVER-HUNT as the *number* of attempts a
> sender will make. Why not naming it MAX-NUMBER-SERVER-HUNT?
> 
> Best regards
> - --
> =======================================================================
>  Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Dreibholz
> 
>  University of Essen,                            Room ES210
>  Inst. for Experimental Mathematics              Ellernstraße 29
>  Computer Networking Technology Group            D-45326 Essen/Germany
> - -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  E-Mail:     [email protected]
>  Homepage:   http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~dreibh
> =======================================================================
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/dApZ32BbsHYPLWURArBAAKCo0ldoAZqm4aEy80CHM4z470nMZACgoYGS
> X3T/6cSynn22G27gNLl7TRo=
> =4wDY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool