Re: Comments on the Rserpool architecture internet draft -- last call

Maureen,

I've included the section in the document as requested.

Best regards
Michael

On Aug 18, 2003, at 22:49, [email protected] wrote:

> There is no security considerations section in the architecture draft.  
>  I should have caught this earlier -- my bad!
>
> Here is a suggestion:
>
> The Rserpool protocol must allow us to secure the Rserpool  
> infrastructure.  There are security and privacy issues that relate to  
> the namespace, pool element registration and user queries of the  
> namespace.  In [1] a complete threat analysis of Rserpool components  
> is presented.
>
> [1] Threats Introduced by Rserpool and Requirements for Security in  
> response to Threats, draft-ietf-rserpool-threats-00.txt, work in  
> progress.
>
> This is how it is handled in the OPES architecture document  
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opes-architecture 
> -04.txt.
>
> I have some nits, but I'll send them tomorrow.
>
> Of course, other suggestions are welcome.
>
> -- maureen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>