Should ASAP be splitted?

Manuel Urueña <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rserpool
Organization Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Reading the ASAP draft I felt that it seems a little overloaded. In
particular, registration operations are just employed by PEs.

Maybe it would be good to put those operations in another protocol. Or
exactly the same ASAP protocol but without PU related operations. Of
course PE would require both protocols.

This will ease firewall protection, I mean, with ASAP firewalls should
allow ASAP connections to both PEs and NSs. Therefore, remote PUs are
able to send Registration operations to NSs. With two separate
protocols, registration port could be filtered.

Has been this discussed before? comments?

Regards,
--Manuel

-- 
Manuel Uruen~a - Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
GPG FP: 9BE9 9FFF ACFF 2887 80E6 50FE FABC A79F 5535 5A75
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/r3RT+rynn1U1WnURAgMbAJ9Z7XkxbA0GRZOBLAGmpbQA3yM1EQCgjTpi
buqiRiYWp7iHNnY4WaXCg48=
=LhRd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.