RE: FW: AD review of draft-ietf-rserpool-comp-07

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rserpool
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Aron,

> > 4) Text about SLP & l4/l7 I can probably fix.
> 
> John, according to Jon P's email, the L4/L7 stuff is ". . . I 
> think the analysis here is sound. Same for the analysis of 
> L4/L7 switching."  So I wouldn't waste too many cycles on 
> that unless you feel that there is something that needs to be changed.

Agreed.  I think I can just try to clarify the text.
 
> As for the other portions, I'm not familiar with them so I 
> will have to read the drafts.  I think that some of the 
> comments that Qiaobing made in the past regarding 
> loosely-coupled approaches of trying to integrate many 
> protocols versus a tightly-coupled protocol (RSERPOOL) will 
> hold here as well.  All the more so if we stress that 
> RSERPOOL is intended for system with some degree of real-time 
> performance constraints.

I think we need to check the documents Jon pointed out &
craft text to cover the issue.

John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.