| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.rserpool |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Zitat von Johnson Walter-CWJ002 <[email protected]>:
> I agree with all the changes but would like to suggest another. Much like
> Michael's suggestion in section 3.3 to align the R bit in
> PEER_NAME_TABLE_RESPONSE with PEER_PRESENCE and PEER_LIST_RESPONSE. How about
> the following for the 8 bit flag field. Define bit 15 to be the R flag bit,
> bit 14 to be the M flag bit, and bit 13 to be W flag bit as shown below the
> pertinent ENRP protocol messages. This would allow a single mask at least
> until the time that more than 8 flags were required.
>
> PEER_PRESENCE 0000000R
> PEER_NAME_TABLE 00000W00
> PEER_NAME_TABLE_RESPONSE 000000MR (Change as suggested by Michael)
> PEER_LIST_RESPONSE 0000000R
>
> This would also work for the ASAP protocol messages as currently defined.
>
> REGISTRATION_RESPONSE 0000000R
This change is a good idea. I support this.
Best regards
Thomas Dreibholz
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.