Re: ENRP Name Server Takeover Problem
Thomas Dreibholz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rserpool |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:14 schrieb Michael Tuexen: > Another point came up on the discussion with Thomas. It is regarding > the sequence of TLV fields in parameters/messages. Is the sequence > required to be the one shown in the documents or are other > sequences also acceptable? PeerOwnershipChange for example requires a sequence (PE Identifier Parameter belong to the pool specified by the latest Pool Handle Parameter). Therefore, it is consistent to make the order mandatory. Best regards - -- ======================================================================= Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Dreibholz University of Essen, Room ES210 Inst. for Experimental Mathematics Ellernstraße 29 Computer Networking Technology Group D-45326 Essen/Germany - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~dreibh ======================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBL16r32BbsHYPLWURAsD+AKClX9AJEQG61hxOkWd8oXPYwfr/iwCdF/RV mzh+ggZmZGHYIjDa0f0yEzw= =OPsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----