Re: PEER_ERROR message
Thomas Dreibholz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rserpool |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Essen, Institute for Experimental Mathematics |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 11 October 2004 22:46, Johnson Walter-CWJ002 wrote: > Any reference to the PEER_ERROR message should be removed from the ASAP > protocol document since I believe it is not an ASAP message. It is useful to have this message type in ASAP, because e.g. a component (NS, PE or PU) could receive a bad message via ASAP. Then, it can report the sender that it does not understand/accept this message via a PEER_ERROR. This is useful for debugging. To make ASAP and ENRP PEER_ERROR more consistent, their definitions and especially the message type number (currently: 0x0e or ASAP, 0x0b for ENRP) could be unified. For example, the message number could be 0xff for both. Best regards - -- ======================================================================= Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Dreibholz University of Essen, Room ES210 Inst. for Experimental Mathematics Ellernstraße 29 Computer Networking Technology Group D-45326 Essen/Germany - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~dreibh ======================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBa50632BbsHYPLWURAg5hAJwPJxLFPfWhNx0afzjntqKl/rmgagCdGO+G EDx/otU5qMtWX79xZKnCSxU= =K88g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----