Re: PEER_ERROR message

I like the idea, too.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 13, 2004, at 10:26 Uhr, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 12 October 2004 22:29, Johnson Walter-CWJ002 wrote:
>> Within the
>> drafts, the message names only act as tags for the real messages sent  
>> over
>> the wire so why not make them as descriptive as possible. In this  
>> case, it
>> might be best to make it ASAP_ERROR and ENRP_ERROR to identify the  
>> protocol
>> error type.
>
> This is a good idea.
>
>
> Best regards
> - --
> =======================================================================
>  Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Dreibholz
>
>  University of Essen,                            Room ES210
>  Inst. for Experimental Mathematics              Ellernstraße 29
>  Computer Networking Technology Group            D-45326 Essen/Germany
> -  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  E-Mail:     [email protected]
>  Homepage:   http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~dreibh
> =======================================================================
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBbObD32BbsHYPLWURAg9XAJ9vEEkB/jDFHmGbES//iXSCmcaObgCggRLI
> LmYzwgU86EPObK9OWdYrUeo=
> =0RGl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>