Re: Make policies document a WG document?

Peter Lei <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rserpool
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sounds reasonable especially since the text comes from an existing
WG draft and helps other pool policies to be defined outside the
base protocol spec (as discussed in San Diego).

regards,
--peter

[email protected] wrote:
> Here is text from the Rserpool minutes in San Diego.  We agreed to move
> ASAP policies to this new policies document, but neglected to formally
> ask for the policies document to be a WG document. 
> 
> A policies draft was presented (draft-tuexen-rserpool-policies-00.txt).
> This draft presents new policies for reliable server pooling. The
> proposal was to take the pool policies currently included in the ASAP
> draft and separate them into a separate policies draft. This allows the
> stable base ASAP protocol specification to be separated from the pool
> policies which are subject to further investigation and more substantial
> changes. Consensus was reached in the meeting to make this change. We
> will take the proposal to the mailing list.
> 
> Are there any objections to making draft-tuexen-rserpool-policies-00.txt
> a WG document?  
> 
> Please let us know promptly if you object. 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- Maureen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>

_______________________________________________
rserpool mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.