Re: ASAP and ENRP drafts - suggested modifications

Qiaobing Xie <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:02:39 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rserpool
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Walter,

....
> Since there is no server identifier parameter defined currently in the RSerPool drafts, I want to be clear on what we plan to add to the ENDPOINT_KEEP_ALIVE and SERVER_ANNOUNCE messages. Are we adding a server information parameter, a server ID, or a newly defined common parameter called Server Identifier parameter to the ENDPOINT_KEEP_ALIVE and SERVER_ANNOUNCE messages? I would lobby for either of the latter cases.

I'd say either the existing Server Information TLV or the 32-bit Server ID should be used. 
Adding a new similar param may cause confusion, unless one can show that the existing params 
won't do the job.

regards,
-Qiaobing

> 
> Walter  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>