Re: Length of the Policy Type field
Qiaobing Xie <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:35:51 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rserpool |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas, That sounds like a good idea to me. regards, -Qiaobing Thomas Dreibholz wrote: > Hi! > > According to the policies draft, the size of the policy type identifier is 8 > bits. However, there are already 16 policies implemented by the rsplib > prototype implementation (see > http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/) and it can be > expected that new applications require additional policies. Since the Policy > Parameters for each of the defined policies includes 24 reserved (i.e. > unused) bits after the policy type, what about extending the Policy Type to > 32 bits? While this would not increase the message sizes, it would give > implementers and users sufficient space for own extensions. Furthermore, I > would suggest to split the policy type space into a reserved part > for "standardized" policies (managed by the IANA) and a non-standard user > part, e.g. 0x00000000 to 0x7fffffff for registered policies and the rest for > user-defined ones. > > > Best regards > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rserpool mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool