Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft

Dear all,

I'm not an expert for MIBs...

The document looks OK to me except for one thing:

It looks like poolElementEntry does not provide support
for the Opaque transport parameter.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:

> Ong, Lyndon skrev:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> There is one remaining draft on our list of WG drafts, which is the  =

>> MIB
>> draft.  We would like to start WG Last Call on this draft and get  =

>> this
>> ready for IESG review as a potential Exp RFC as a companion to the  =

>> others.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please have a look at the current draft
>> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rserpool- =

>> mib-07.txt) and
>> provide comments back to the mailing list by Wednesday, October  =

>> 29^th .
>>
>>
>
> I have seen no reports that anyone has reviewed this document. If  =

> there
> are no other than the authors that have an interest in this document I
> think we should put a halt to the publication until there is a real
> demand for the MIB. The reason is that I don't really want to spend,  =

> MIB
> doctor review, AD, IESG and RFC-editor resources and cycles on a
> document where there are no interest.
>
> Regards
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
> F=E4r=F6gatan 6                | Fax   +46 8 7575550
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool
>