"Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft"
xing zhou <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:29:14 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rserpool |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1022426913== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_07bd199e-6502-4f39-bfcd-bb48cc4853f4_" --_07bd199e-6502-4f39-bfcd-bb48cc4853f4_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all of RSerPool WG,I and my college use RSerPool, we have deployed i= t in our college's lab and used for simulation distribution and , the d= ocument looks ok to me except for the opaque transport parameter, we se= e the need to define a MIB because it would be very useful to access RSer= Pool component status by network management tools. I have reviewed the M= IB draft and think it is okay .Best regards.Xing Zhou=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DProf. Xing ZhouHainan UniversityCollege = of Information Sciences & Technology58 Renmin Ave.Haikou,Hainan,570228,Ch= ina---------------------------------------------------------E-Mail: zhoux= [email protected], [email protected] Phone:(+86)0898-66279141(O) 662= 50584(H) Mobile Phone:13034993089=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > From: [email protected]> Subject: rserpool D= igest, Vol 45, Issue 4> To: [email protected]> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:= 00:01 -0700> > Send rserpool mailing list submissions to> rserpo [email protected]> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit= > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool> or, via email, send a m= essage with subject or body 'help' to> [email protected]> > You c= an reach the person managing the list at> [email protected]> > When= replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re= : Contents of rserpool digest..."> > > Today's Topics:> > 1. WG Last Call= on the Rserpool MIB draft (Chris Singh)> 2. Re: WG Last Call on the Rser= pool MIB draft (Michael T?xen)> 3. Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB d= raft (Thomas Dreibholz)> 4. Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft (J= obin Pulinthanath)> > > -------------------------------------------------= ---------------------> > Message: 1> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:30:34 +000= 0> From: Chris Singh <[email protected]>> Subject: [Rserpool] WG Last = Call on the Rserpool MIB draft> To: <[email protected]>> Message-ID: <BAY= [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"> > > > Please have a = look at the current draft> > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-i= etf-rserpool-mib-07.txt) and> > provide comments back to the mailing list= by Wednesday, October 29th.> > Hi,> > we currently apply RSerPool RSPLIB= test setup do load distribution for compute services. Our compny Megacon= Systems Ltd. is new startup company developing Grid/distributed computing= software product and services. Having SNMP support would benefit for man= agement integration into network management tool. I have reviewed draft d= ocument and think is okay.> > > Kind regards,> > Chris Singh> MegaconSyst= ems Limited> 30/9, Guru House, Old Rajinder Nagar> New Delhi, Delhi 11006= 0, India> > _____________________________________________________________= ____> Searching for the best deals on travel? Visit MSN Travel.> http://i= n.msn.com/coxandkings> > ------------------------------> > Message: 2> Da= te: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:24:19 +0100> From:=20 Michael T?xen <[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool= ] WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft> To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.w= [email protected]>> Cc: "Ong, Lyndon" <[email protected]>, rserpool@ie= tf.org> Message-ID: <[email protected].= de>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed; del= sp=3Dyes> > Dear all,> > I'm not an expert for MIBs...> > The document lo= oks OK to me except for one thing:> > It looks like poolElementEntry does= not provide support> for the Opaque transport parameter.> > Best regards= > Michael> > On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:> > > O= ng, Lyndon skrev:> >> Hi Folks,> >>> >>> >>> >> There is one remaining dr= aft on our list of WG drafts, which is the > >> MIB> >> draft. We would l= ike to start WG Last Call on this draft and get > >> this> >> ready for I= ESG review as a potential Exp RFC as a companion to the > >> others.> >>>= >>> >>> >> Please have a look at the current d raft> >> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rserpool- > >> = mib-07.txt) and> >> provide comments back to the mailing list by Wednesda= y, October > >> 29^th .> >>> >>> >> > I have seen no reports that anyone = has reviewed this document. If > > there> > are no other than the authors= that have an interest in this document I> > think we should put a halt t= o the publication until there is a real> > demand for the MIB. The reason= is that I don't really want to spend, > > MIB> > doctor review, AD, IESG= and RFC-editor resources and cycles on a> > document where there are no = interest.> >> > Regards> >> > Magnus Westerlund> >> > IETF Transport Area= Director & TSVWG Chair> > ----------------------------------------------= ------------------------> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EA= B/TVM> > ----------------------------------------------------------------= ------> > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287> > F?r?gatan 6 | Fax +46 8 75= 75550> > S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mai lto: [email protected]> > ---------------------------------= -------------------------------------> > ________________________________= _______________> > rserpool mailing list> > [email protected]> > https://= www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool> >> > > > ------------------------= ------> > Message: 3> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:34 +0100> From: Thomas= Dreibholz <[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool] WG Last Call = on the Rserpool MIB draft> To: [email protected]> Cc: Michael T?xen <Mich= [email protected]>, "Ong, Lyndon"> <[email protected]>> Message-= ID: <[email protected]>> Content-Type: text/plain;= charset=3D"iso-8859-1"> > On Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008, Michael T?xen w= rote:> > The document looks OK to me except for one thing:> >> > It looks= like poolElementEntry does not provide support> > for the Opaque transpo= rt parameter.> > Dear all,> > this parameter is still missing. I will add= it to the MIB.> > > Best regards> -- > =3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> Dr. Thomas Dre= ibholz> > University of Duisburg-Essen, Room ES210> Inst. for Experimenta= l Mathematics Ellernstra?e 29> Computer Networking Technology Group D-453= 26 Essen/Germany> -------------------------------------------------------= ----------------> E-Mail: [email protected]> Homepage: http://www.iem= .uni-due.de/~dreibh> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D> > -------------- next part --------------> An HTML attachment = was scrubbed...> URL: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rserpool/atta= chments/20081030/2750e241/attachment-0001.htm>> -------------- next part = --------------> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...> Name: not availabl= e> Type: application/pgp-signature> Size: 197 bytes> Desc: This is a digi= tally signed message part.> Url : <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/r= serpool/attachments/20081030/2750e241/attachment-0001.sig>> > -----------= ------------------- > > Message: 4> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:44:45 +0100> From: Jobin Pulin= thanath <[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool] WG Last Call on the = Rserpool MIB draft> To: [email protected]> Message-ID: <4909D66D.3010609@= iem.uni-due.de>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-15> > > I h= ave seen no reports that anyone has reviewed this document. If there> > a= re no other than the authors that have an interest in this document I> > = think we should put a halt to the publication until there is a real> > de= mand for the MIB. The reason is that I don't really want to spend,> > MIB= > > doctor review, AD, IESG and RFC-editor resources and cycles on a> > d= ocument where there are no interest.> > > Dear all,> > I am working with = RSerPool for some research in the area of Network> Management particularl= y with regard to IPFIX. I think it is important to> define a specific com= mon MIB for RSerPool. Without a MIB institutions> who work with RSerPool = will define their own MIB, which leads to>=20 incompatibility and inconsistency. Since the RSerPool core documents are= > RFC now, I see the need that the MIB document proceeds to RFC too. I> a= gree with the opinion mentioned by Michael, that the Opaque transport> pa= rameter is missing, else the draft is ok.> > > Best regards,> > Jobin> > = -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------= ---> Dipl.-Wirt.-Inf. Jobin Pulinthanath> Institute for Computer Science = and Business Information Systems> University of Duisburg-Essen> Germany> = E-Mail: [email protected]> ----------------------------------------------= -------------------------> > > ------------------------------> > ________= _______________________________________> rserpool mailing list> rserpool@= ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool> > > End of rser= pool Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4> *************************************** _________________________________________________________________ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now= ! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx --_07bd199e-6502-4f39-bfcd-bb48cc4853f4_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <style> .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma } </style> </head> <body class=3D'hmmessage'> <P style=3D"MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; MARGI= N-RIGHT: 0px">Dear all of RSerPool WG,<BR><BR>I and my college use R= SerPool, we have deployed it in our college's lab and used for simu= lation distribution and , the document looks ok to me ex= cept for the opaque transport parameter, we see the need to define = a MIB because it would be very useful to access RSerPool component status= by network management tools. I have reviewed the MIB draft and thi= nk it is okay .</P><BR>Best regards.<BR><BR>Xing Zhou<BR><BR>=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>Prof. Xing Zhou<BR><BR= >Hainan University<BR>College of Information Sciences & Technology<BR= >58 Renmin Ave.Haikou,Hainan,570228,China<BR>----------------------------= -----------------------------<BR>E-Mail: <A href=3D"mailto:zhouxing@hainu= .edu.cn" target=3D_blank><U><FONT color=3D#0000ff>[email protected]</= FONT></U></A>, <A href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">xingz [email protected]</A> <BR>Phone:(+86)0898-66279141(O) 6625058= 4(H) <BR>Mobile Phone:13034993089<BR>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D <BR>> From: [email protected]<BR>&= gt; Subject: rserpool Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4<BR>> To: [email protected]= rg<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:00:01 -0700<BR>> <BR>> Send rs= erpool mailing list submissions to<BR>> [email protected]<BR>> <BR>= > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>> ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool<BR>> or, via email, send = a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>> [email protected]= g<BR>> <BR>> You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>> = [email protected]<BR>> <BR>> When replying, please edit your = Subject line so it is more specific<BR>> than "Re: Contents of rserpoo= l digest..."<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Today's Topics:<BR>> <BR>> 1= . WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft (Chris Singh) <BR>> 2. Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft (Michael T?xen)<B= R>> 3. Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft (Thomas Dreibholz)<B= R>> 4. Re: WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draft (Jobin Pulinthanath)= <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ----------------------------------------------= ------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 1<BR>> Date: Wed, 2= 9 Oct 2008 20:30:34 +0000<BR>> From: Chris Singh <chris.singh@live.= com><BR>> Subject: [Rserpool] WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB draf= t<BR>> To: <[email protected]><BR>> Message-ID: <BAY116-W4= [email protected]><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; = charset=3D"iso-8859-1"<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > Please have a look = at the current draft<BR>> > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/dr= aft-ietf-rserpool-mib-07.txt) and<BR>> > provide comments back to t= he mailing list by Wednesday, October 29th.<BR>> <BR>> Hi,<BR>> = <BR>> we currently apply RSerPool RSPLIB test setup do load distribution for compute services. Our compny Megaco= nSystems Ltd. is new startup company developing Grid/distributed computin= g software product and services. Having SNMP support would benefit for ma= nagement integration into network management tool. I have reviewed draft = document and think is okay.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Kind regards,<BR>&g= t; <BR>> Chris Singh<BR>> MegaconSystems Limited<BR>> 30/9, Guru= House, Old Rajinder Nagar<BR>> New Delhi, Delhi 110060, India<BR>>= <BR>> _______________________________________________________________= __<BR>> Searching for the best deals on travel? Visit MSN Travel.<BR>&= gt; http://in.msn.com/coxandkings<BR>> <BR>> ----------------------= --------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 2<BR>> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:24= :19 +0100<BR>> From: Michael T?xen <[email protected]= e><BR>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool] WG Last Call on the Rserpool MIB dr= aft<BR>> To: Magnus Westerlund <mag [email protected]><BR>> Cc: "Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Cien= a.com>, [email protected]<BR>> Message-ID: <042647A3-2E97-4F2B-B= [email protected]><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; = charset=3DISO-8859-1; format=3Dflowed; delsp=3Dyes<BR>> <BR>> Dear = all,<BR>> <BR>> I'm not an expert for MIBs...<BR>> <BR>> The = document looks OK to me except for one thing:<BR>> <BR>> It looks l= ike poolElementEntry does not provide support<BR>> for the Opaque tran= sport parameter.<BR>> <BR>> Best regards<BR>> Michael<BR>> <B= R>> On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:<BR>> <BR>= > > Ong, Lyndon skrev:<BR>> >> Hi Folks,<BR>> >><= BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> There is one remaining= draft on our list of WG drafts, which is the <BR>> >> MIB<BR>&g= t; >> draft. We would like to start WG Last Call on this draft and = get <BR>> >> this<BR>> >> rea dy for IESG review as a potential Exp RFC as a companion to the <BR>>= >> others.<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>&= gt; >> Please have a look at the current draft<BR>> >> (ht= tp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rserpool- <BR>> >> = mib-07.txt) and<BR>> >> provide comments back to the mailing lis= t by Wednesday, October <BR>> >> 29^th .<BR>> >><BR>>= ; >><BR>> ><BR>> > I have seen no reports that anyone h= as reviewed this document. If <BR>> > there<BR>> > are no oth= er than the authors that have an interest in this document I<BR>> >= think we should put a halt to the publication until there is a real<BR>&= gt; > demand for the MIB. The reason is that I don't really want to sp= end, <BR>> > MIB<BR>> > doctor review, AD, IESG and RFC-edito= r resources and cycles on a<BR>> > document where there are no inte= rest.<BR>> ><BR>> > Regards<B R>> ><BR>> > Magnus Westerlund<BR>> ><BR>> > IET= F Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair<BR>> > ----------------= ------------------------------------------------------<BR>> > Multi= media Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM<BR>> > --------------= --------------------------------------------------------<BR>> > Eri= csson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287<BR>> > F?r?gatan 6 | Fax +46 8 75755= 50<BR>> > S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@er= icsson.com<BR>> > -------------------------------------------------= ---------------------<BR>> > ______________________________________= _________<BR>> > rserpool mailing list<BR>> > [email protected]= rg<BR>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool<BR>> &g= t;<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>&= gt; <BR>> Message: 3<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:34 +0100<BR>= > From: Thomas Dreibholz <dreibh@ie m.uni-due.de><BR>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool] WG Last Call on the Rse= rpool MIB draft<BR>> To: [email protected]<BR>> Cc: Michael T?xen &= lt;[email protected]>, "Ong, Lyndon"<BR>> <Lyong@= ciena.com><BR>> Message-ID: <[email protected]= ue.de><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"<BR>>= ; <BR>> On Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008, Michael T?xen wrote:<BR>> &g= t; The document looks OK to me except for one thing:<BR>> ><BR>>= > It looks like poolElementEntry does not provide support<BR>> >= ; for the Opaque transport parameter.<BR>> <BR>> Dear all,<BR>> = <BR>> this parameter is still missing. I will add it to the MIB.<BR>&g= t; <BR>> <BR>> Best regards<BR>> -- <BR>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>> Dr. Thomas Dreibholz<B= R>> <BR>> University of Duisburg-Essen, Room ES210<BR>> Inst. fo= r Experimental Mathematics Ellern stra?e 29<BR>> Computer Networking Technology Group D-45326 Essen/Ger= many<BR>> ------------------------------------------------------------= -----------<BR>> E-Mail: [email protected]<BR>> Homepage: http:= //www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh<BR>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>> <BR>> -------------- next part ---= -----------<BR>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> URL: <h= ttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rserpool/attachments/20081030/2750e24= 1/attachment-0001.htm><BR>> -------------- next part --------------= <BR>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>> Name: not availabl= e<BR>> Type: application/pgp-signature<BR>> Size: 197 bytes<BR>>= Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.<BR>> Url : <https:/= /www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rserpool/attachments/20081030/2750e241/atta= chment-0001.sig><BR>> <BR>> ------------------------------<BR>&g= t; <BR>> Message: 4<BR>> Da te: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:44:45 +0100<BR>> From: Jobin Pulinthanath <= ;[email protected]><BR>> Subject: Re: [Rserpool] WG Last Call on th= e Rserpool MIB draft<BR>> To: [email protected]<BR>> Message-ID: &l= t;[email protected]><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; c= harset=3DISO-8859-15<BR>> <BR>> > I have seen no reports that an= yone has reviewed this document. If there<BR>> > are no other than = the authors that have an interest in this document I<BR>> > think w= e should put a halt to the publication until there is a real<BR>> >= demand for the MIB. The reason is that I don't really want to spend,<BR>= > > MIB<BR>> > doctor review, AD, IESG and RFC-editor resourc= es and cycles on a<BR>> > document where there are no interest.<BR>= > <BR>> <BR>> Dear all,<BR>> <BR>> I am working with RSerP= ool for some research in the area of Network<BR>> Management particula= rly with regard to IPFIX. I think it is imp ortant to<BR>> define a specific common MIB for RSerPool. Without a M= IB institutions<BR>> who work with RSerPool will define their own MIB,= which leads to<BR>> incompatibility and inconsistency. Since the RSer= Pool core documents are<BR>> RFC now, I see the need that the MIB docu= ment proceeds to RFC too. I<BR>> agree with the opinion mentioned by M= ichael, that the Opaque transport<BR>> parameter is missing, else the = draft is ok.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Best regards,<BR>> <BR>> Job= in<BR>> <BR>> -- <BR>> -----------------------------------------= ------------------------------<BR>> Dipl.-Wirt.-Inf. Jobin Pulinthanat= h<BR>> Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems= <BR>> University of Duisburg-Essen<BR>> Germany<BR>> E-Mail: jp@= iem.uni-due.de<BR>> --------------------------------------------------= ---------------------<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -------------------------= -----<BR>> <BR>> __________________ _____________________________<BR>> rserpool mailing list<BR>> rser= [email protected]<BR>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool<BR>&= gt; <BR>> <BR>> End of rserpool Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4<BR>> ***= ************************************<BR><br /><hr />Get news, entertainme= nt and everything you care about at Live.com. <a href=3D'http://www.live.= com/getstarted.aspx ' target=3D'_new'>Check it out!</a></body> </html> --_07bd199e-6502-4f39-bfcd-bb48cc4853f4_-- --===============1022426913== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ rserpool mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool --===============1022426913==--