Re: ASAP Handle Resolution Option

Hi Folks,

Not to pass judgement one way or another on the handle resolution
option, but I don't see our A-Ds favoring the creation of a new item on
our charter.  I believe the most likely direction forward on this is as
an individual draft rather than a Working Group activity.

I will check with Lars and Magnus, though.

Best regards,

Lyndon



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Dirk Hoffstadt
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 6:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Rserpool] ASAP Handle Resolution Option

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear all,

What about the draft draft-dreibholz-rserpool-asap-hropt-03
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dreibholz-rserpool-asap-hropt-03) on
the ASAP Handle Resolution option to specify the requested number of PE
entries to be selected? I think this is a quite useful extension and
should also be moved forward.

In our deployed RSerPool pool for SimProcTC, we do not need the PU-side
handle resolution cache. Therefore, on a handle resolution, the ENRP
server should exactly select one PE entry for the SimProcTC PU. ASAP as
defined in RFC 5352 lacks of the possibility to specify this. The handle
resolution option allows the PU to exactly tell this information to the
ENRP server. So, the ENRP  server can exactly select the one PE entry
for our SimProcPC PU -- while it can provide more entries to PUs
actually making use of the PU-side cache. I see a clear need for
standardization of such an option, since its functionality is IMHO
mandatory for efficient handle resolution.

- --
Best regards,
Dirk Hoffstadt
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
M.Sc. Dirk Hoffstadt
DH Datentechnik
45219 Essen Germany
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.dhdt.de PGP-PublicKey:
https://dhdt.de/private/dirkhoffstadt_pubpgp.asc
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJJBw+AAoJEAl0PP0XKTexS1oH/0V820ZYdH+vLZA8KbaNNY/7
XgJBXwL4D1FGVZUbhUSQtQpBxOB1dV95Wa5eU/c2gRd+TupmUXQB7BpBC/VEGqi+
wCrxmUpIpubSuVZfaZ341ZDnotgsBoXszjaPQWDTzR6UhOG7k67dalBgN53j2B66
qvGuryvRacGVhYT9QM3D5mftNPcUP7dzAJn7ioDBkfVAFkFercPwC8SrPFU/6Dan
XCEhVzvS394+vIGN0EohDjsqMIDjQKQZ8NBAYgmXnm70Znyo4sSogHDH9i0QvzDE
jWtz7QeBlu7bHrzare2EMNElKiq/v0FX4jUe+TszD+dbP3BE0ijo+FWez0kpaas=
=Xreh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
rserpool mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool