Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP

Kireeti,

> > The GMPLS RSVP-TE, which is done in IETF, makes major modifications to
> > RFC3209 and RFC2205 version of RSVP. The rest of the changes been
> > requested are three new objects, new error codes to support these
> > objects. This can hardly be characterized as forcibly changing RSVP or
> > major change in direction...
> 
> Do you consider deprecating ResvErr and ResvTear not "forcibly changing
> RSVP or major change in direction"?
> 

Well, it's my turn to beg to differ :) If you read the document && understand it
&& don't take any prejudice, then it may be more like specifying rules for using
a protocol for an application with some hard requirements.

Regards,

Yangguang