[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:44:53 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 01/12/2025 16:16, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I would suggest that a better way to do
> that would be to try to get to some consensus about whether there
> is in fact a problem that needs to be solved and what that problem is,

Yeah, I guess that's why I was puzzled. I think it's obvious
what the problem is (and that's even described in the draft).
I guess someone could claim that the zoo of PQ codepoints we
can't stop ourselves adding to registries won't damage interop
but I don't find that at all convincing.

Whether we can reach consensus on some way to mitigate the
problem is a real question though, for sure.

S.

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)