[saag] Re: post quantum guidance draft

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:42:54 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 12/12/2025 13:36, Salz, Rich wrote:
> We have that: each WG with its own subject-matter experts, is coming
> up with how to use PQ for its domain.  You seem to think that’s a
> problem and want to write “one guidance to rule them all” and I
> don’t think that’s a good idea.

I don't want to do that. The draft specifically says it is not
trying to control what WGs do. It is aimed at providing simple
high-level near-term guidance for those deploying. You may still
consider that a bad idea, but it's not a "rule them all" thing
at all.

Cheers,
S.

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)