[saag] Re: Suggested Project
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 09:26:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBPOUfHE+P7aFh3p-vWVEegYu8JBMjO6CApJnScJ+eWp6g@mail.gmail.com> |
Maybe? It seems like we'd want some evidence that either (1) manufacturers were interested in broadcasting such a signal or (2) regulators were interested in requiring it. Is there some? -Ekr On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:01 AM Michael StJohns <[email protected]> wrote: > HI Eric et al - > > Let's turn this about 90 degrees. I agree with John and Eric about the > policy issues, but instead of using Bluetooth to ask permission, how about > just having it broadcast "recording in progress here"? That's something > that the policy/law folk can mandate and that a human in the loop (or even > an automated system) can take action on. And the law(s) can make carve > outs for where confidential recording is permitted. > > All that said - Bluetooth is usually not in our wheelhouse unless also > tied to IP. > > Mike > > > On 3/9/2026 09:05, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 4:02 AM Joe Chiarella <[email protected]> wrote: > >> To whom it may concern: (Russ Housley pointed me to this email) >> >> >> >> I’m thinking about the growing problem of “smart glasses” and their >> stealth recording. What if there was a standard Bluetooth protocol whereby >> glasses would be required to “handshake” with all other Bluetooth devices >> in range (smartphones, laptops, lapel pins, other glasses, etc.) and ask >> for permission to record (something like robots.txt for web pages). If ANY >> devices in range say “no” then recording is blocked. Does that make sense? >> > > As John Mattsson's response suggests, the question of nonconsensual > recording > seems like a policy question about who decides whether recording is > permissible > that is not readily solved by technical means. The issue is that there are > some > settings where we want people to be able to deny consent (inside your > house?) > but others where we do not (law enforcement officers preventing protesters > from recording). These are not really technically distinguishable. > > -Ekr > > > > > > > > >> >> Just an idea. And probably one that someone else has already had. But I >> toss it out just in case. >> >> >> >> ps – I’d love if this also worked for Amazon Alexa type “smart” devices >> to indicate whether or not they should be “listening”. >> >> >> >> Make it a great day! >> >> >> >> *Joe Chiarella* >> >> www.JoeChiarella.com <https://www.joechiarella.com/> >> >> [email protected] >> >> +1 (717) 439-7743 >> >> *[image: LinkedinProfileButton]* >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephchiarella> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> *Chiarella’s 8-C Philosophy*: >> >> >> *“Strive to Contribute, Create and Collaborate. Cultivate a healthy >> Curiosity and a Constructive mindset. Grow Courageously. Most of all, Care >> for others.”* >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> saag mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
image001.png
(image/png, 659 B) - not displayed