[saag] Re: Suggested Project

Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2026 09:26:29 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag
Message-ID <CABcZeBPOUfHE+P7aFh3p-vWVEegYu8JBMjO6CApJnScJ+eWp6g@mail.gmail.com>
Maybe? It seems like we'd want some evidence that either (1) manufacturers
were interested in broadcasting such a signal or (2) regulators were
interested in requiring it. Is there some?


-Ekr


On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:01 AM Michael StJohns <[email protected]>
wrote:

> HI Eric et al -
>
> Let's turn this about 90 degrees.  I agree with John and Eric about the
> policy issues, but instead of using Bluetooth to ask permission, how about
> just having it broadcast "recording in progress here"?  That's something
> that the policy/law folk can mandate and that a human in the loop (or even
> an automated system) can take action on.   And the law(s) can make carve
> outs for where confidential recording is permitted.
>
> All that said - Bluetooth is usually not in our wheelhouse unless also
> tied to IP.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 3/9/2026 09:05, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 4:02 AM Joe Chiarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> To whom it may concern: (Russ Housley pointed me to this email)
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m thinking about the growing problem of “smart glasses” and their
>> stealth recording. What if there was a standard Bluetooth protocol whereby
>> glasses would be required to “handshake” with all other Bluetooth devices
>> in range (smartphones, laptops, lapel pins, other glasses, etc.) and ask
>> for permission to record (something like robots.txt for web pages). If ANY
>> devices in range say “no” then recording is blocked. Does that make sense?
>>
>
> As John Mattsson's response suggests, the question of nonconsensual
> recording
> seems like a policy question about who decides whether recording is
> permissible
> that is not readily solved by technical means. The issue is that there are
> some
> settings where we want people to be able to deny consent (inside your
> house?)
> but others where we do not (law enforcement officers preventing protesters
> from recording). These are not really technically distinguishable.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Just an idea. And probably one that someone else has already had. But I
>> toss it out just in case.
>>
>>
>>
>> ps – I’d love if this also worked for Amazon Alexa type “smart” devices
>> to indicate whether or not they should be “listening”.
>>
>>
>>
>> Make it a great day!
>>
>>
>>
>> *Joe Chiarella*
>>
>> www.JoeChiarella.com <https://www.joechiarella.com/>
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> +1 (717) 439-7743
>>
>> *[image: LinkedinProfileButton]*
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josephchiarella>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *Chiarella’s 8-C Philosophy*:
>>
>>
>> *“Strive to Contribute, Create and Collaborate. Cultivate a healthy
>> Curiosity and a Constructive mindset. Grow Courageously. Most of all, Care
>> for others.”*
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
image001.png (image/png, 659 B) - not displayed