[saag] An ISO Liaison Talk at Next IETF Meeting?
Wang Guilin <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Apr 2026 03:13:27 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============5712073464146447427==
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_ff8ecaf9bcf84fddb743ec3c375d2c69huaweicom_"
--_000_ff8ecaf9bcf84fddb743ec3c375d2c69huaweicom_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It has been widely known that ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 is standardizing 3 post-q=
uantum KEM algorithms, and beginning to standardize PQ signature algorithms=
.
https://committee.iso.org/sites/jtc1sc27/home/projects.html
However, it seems that no any ISO PQ algorithm standardization progress has=
been communicated at IETF. After searching https://www.ietf.org/about/liai=
sons/, no liaison relationship was found between IETF and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC.=
27.
As so many working groups in SEC area are developing PQ migration specifica=
tions, is it a good idea to invite ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 giving such a progre=
ss talk in SAAG or CFRG at the next IETF meeting?
Cheers,
Guilin
--_000_ff8ecaf9bcf84fddb743ec3c375d2c69huaweicom_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Microsoft YaHei";
panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 2 4 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@Microsoft YaHei";}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.cf01
{mso-style-name:cf01;
font-family:Consolas;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-SG" link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72" style=3D"word-wrap:=
break-word">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-family:"Microsoft YaHei&quo=
t;,sans-serif">It has been widely known that
</span><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font-family:"Mi=
crosoft YaHei",sans-serif">ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 is standardizing 3 post=
-quantum KEM algorithms, and beginning to standardize PQ signature algorith=
ms. <o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif">https://committee.iso.org/s=
ites/jtc1sc27/home/projects.html
<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></s=
pan></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif">However, it seems that no a=
ny ISO PQ algorithm standardization progress has been communicated at IETF.=
After searching
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/about/liaisons/">https://www.ietf.org/about=
/liaisons/</a>, no liaison relationship was found between IETF and ISO/IEC =
JTC 1/SC.27.
<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></s=
pan></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif">As so many working groups i=
n SEC area are developing PQ migration specifications, is it a good idea to=
invite ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 giving such a progress
talk in SAAG or CFRG at the next IETF meeting? <o:p></o:p></span></span></=
p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></s=
pan></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif">Cheers,
<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></s=
pan></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span class=3D"cf01"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font=
-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif">Guilin</span></span><span s=
tyle=3D"font-family:"Microsoft YaHei",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></sp=
an></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_ff8ecaf9bcf84fddb743ec3c375d2c69huaweicom_--
--===============5712073464146447427==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kc2FhZyBtYWls
aW5nIGxpc3QgLS0gc2FhZ0BpZXRmLm9yZwpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBzZW5kIGFuIGVtYWlsIHRv
IHNhYWctbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK
--===============5712073464146447427==--