[saag] Re: draft update on discussion on crypto practices at IETF

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025, 12:09 PM Simon Josefsson <simon=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Hiya,
> >
> > On 23/01/2025 14:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >> Thanks for this example, as I think it shows that you've badly
> >> mischaracterized my position.
> >
> > Sorry, I was trying to describe what I'm relatively
> > sure some other folks took as being your position,
> > but I guess I didn't phrase it well enough. I agree
> > that their impression of your position differs from
> > what you intended.
>
> Interesting.  I read both Eric's original statement and the
> clarification both expressing the identical message: "we don't want to
> publish ntruprime-SSH as an RFC standard".  As far as I can tell that is
> Eric's position [1].  My interpretation of Eric's clarification being
> identical to the original quote is based on the incorrect but often
> repeated claim (even by IETF AD's) that the ntruprime-SSH draft is not
> under IETF change control, and the related opinion that only
> NIST-blessed crypto can "serve the IETF purpose".
>

Why is standards track required and not informational?

>
> /Simon
>
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ssh/CH6kRRISzwyorzF-l1NLiIUK05A/
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]