[saag] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02

Hi Rich,

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:54 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Can an Informational level document give guidance?
>
>
>
>    - I think so. Isn't that what most informational level documents do?
>
>
>
> They shouldn’t.
>
>
>
> 4.2.2 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026.html#section-4.2.2>
> Informational
>
>
>
>    An "Informational" specification is published for the general
>
>    information of the Internet community, and does not represent an
>
>    Internet community consensus or recommendation.  The Informational
>
>    designation is intended to provide for the timely publication of a
>
>    very broad range of responsible informational documents from many
>
>    sources, subject only to editorial considerations and to verification
>
>    that there has been adequate coordination with the standards process
>
>    (see section 4.2.3
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026.html#section-4.2.3>).
>
>
>


Dhruv: Also, see RFC 8799, which updates RFC 2026 by requiring all IETF
stream documents to achieve IETF rough consensus.

Thanks!
Dhruv



> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
saag mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]