[saag] Re: [Ext] Re: draft-paulwh-crypto-components-02
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 13, 2025, at 19:43, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW, I am also uncomfortable with informational documents making external normative statements. Agree. > The distinction I am trying to draw here is that if you have an Informational document describing a protocol it's reasonable for it to use normative language that applies to those who implement the protocol. However, I would prefer we not have Informational documents that impose normative requirements on other protocols, etc. Is there wording in the current draft that feels like it imposes normative requirements on other protocols. We tried to suggest rather than demand, but if we missed, it would be good to fix. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ saag mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]